Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(304)
-
▼
July
(31)
- They totally shoulda
- Planned Parenthood Firebombed
- Fight them here so we won't have to fight them there
- God is not Christian
- Someone's cutting onions here
- English, Release 3.31
- Norway: one comment
- Worth the Wait?
- The Hell? How?
- Hey Kid, Free Candy
- Veggie Terror
- Breastfeeding Doll
- Woman gropes TSA agent
- Boobs bite back
- Whale Says Thank You
- Tennessee sees the Light
- Word of the Day
- A Salute to single mothers
- Would you take that bet?
- ...but words will never hurt me
- suggest a clever title and I'll put it here, coz i...
- First they came for the sex dolls,
- I flunk Geography
- Is it your fault someone does something you did no...
- FuckForForests ?!?
- Rape Trees
- Hieroglyphics
- Crooked Tables
- Evil Arts
- Candian Please
- milk of inhuman kindness
-
▼
July
(31)
3 comments:
I believe they are ‘W’s.
… I think.
As for the words, well, I no speaky Martianese.
I don't know what to do with "sionagem" - obvious gibberish.
But the first word is only a problem because of the creeping Victorianism in our country. A problem we've had since the beginning, to be honest, long before Queen Victoria and her fascinatingly small-minded rules.
It's a problem dating back to when the Puritans attempted to colonize these brave shores (and would have failed, had they not been given pagan charity by the indigenous peoples, who were repaid with their efforts by incarceration, mass killings, and the eventual death of their way of life).
The problem is the long-standing distaste of the less-open members of our society for blunt speech. It's their ongoing insistence that any written example of words they consider "profanity" must be hidden, with a string of information-free symbols (in the cartoons), or at least masking some of the letters with other symbols.
The phrase you should have entered is "motherfucker sionagem".
Ahhh, that explains it .
Post a Comment