10/8/10

Mormon Pope Lies


“any type of union other than marriage between a man and a woman is morally wrong,”
an old rich white bigot told millions of gullible Mormons on Sunday.  Milking their delusion that he is a prophet who talks to God, the old buzzard ranted that
“There are those today who not only tolerate but advocate voting to change laws that would legalize immorality, as if a vote would somehow alter the designs of God’s laws and nature,”
“We cannot change; we will not change,” vowed the dishonest old hypocrite, as a black hole of irony soaked up the rest of his meaningless drivel. 

See, it used to be a man and a harem.
"For it is my will, that in time, ye should take unto you wives of the Lamanites and Nephites, that their posterity may become white, delightsome and Just, for even now their females are more virtuous than the gentiles."- Prophet Joseph Smith, The Joseph Smith Revelations Text and Commentary, p. 374-37. 1831
but then it wasn't
“we declare that we believe, that one man should have one wife; and one woman, but one husband, except in the case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again." (section 101, verse 4, Doctrine and Covenants, 1st edition, 1835)
but then it was
if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him; therefore is he justified (132:60-62. Doctrine and Covenants 2nd edition, 1843)
But then it wasn't
“Hiram Brown has been preaching Polygamy, and other false and corrupt doctrines, in the county of Lapeer, state of Michigan.” so “he has been cut off from the Church for his iniquity” Joseph Smith - Times and Seasons, vol. 5, p. 423 (1844)
But it was!
"Now if any of you will deny the plurality of wives, and continue to do so, I promise that you will be damned,(Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 3, p. 266, (1853)"
One man and one woman was teh EVIL.
"The only men who become Gods, even the Sons of God, are those who enter into polygamy," (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 11, p. 269, (1864)
“Plural marriage is not some sort of superfluity or non-essential to the salvation or exaltation of mankind.” Joseph F. Smith - Journal of Discourses, vol. 20, p. 28 (1878)
monogamy was a ticket to hell
"I understand the law of celestial marriage to mean that every man in the Church, who has the ability to obey and practice it in righteousness and will not, shall be damned." Joseph F. Smith - Journal of Discourses, vol. 20, p. 31 (1878)
God said!
"The same God that has thus far dictated me and directed me and strengthened me in this work, gave me this revelation and commandment on celestial and plural marriage, and the same God commanded me to obey it. He said to me that unless I accepted it, and introduced it, and practiced it, I, together with my people would be damned and cut off from this time henceforth. We have got to observe it. It is an eternal principle and was given by way of commandment and not by way of instruction."
- Prophet Joseph Smith, The Contributor, Vol. 5, p. 259 1884
but then it wasn't
“I, Joseph F. Smith, President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, hereby affirm and declare that no such marriages have been solemnized with the sanction, consent, or knowledge of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. And I hereby announce that all such marriages are prohibited,” 1904 Manifesto
and now,
“We cannot change; we will not change,” drools this disgusting old pervert. As if.

Quote of the Day


Just something I overheard.

"Asking Christians to oppose radical Islam is like calling in the Crips to run the Bloods out of town." 

10/7/10

Strange Ritual in Dallas School

When our elder daughter was to take her year of high school "abroad," she elected to go to my US home of Dallas, Texas. [after growing up in Germany]

She lived with our friends there and went to the local public high school. As this was to be her first time living
away from the family, and the first time living abroad, I went with her for the first week (gave me a chance to visit with our friends there anyway).

After the first couple of days, I asked her if all was OK. She said, yes, but she had a hard time getting used to some of the stranger rituals.

Strange rituals? In a Dallas public school?

Yes, she said. The ritual chanting they did every morning.

I said that they were forbidden by federal law to do ritual chanting in a public school.

She insisted that they did just that. They all got up, and said something in unison that started with "I spread the peaches."

I answered that I could not imagine that they all stood up and chanted "I spread the peaches." She said there was more to it, but that was the only part she understood. They mumbled the rest.

Wondering if a Dallas public school had been taken over by Hare Krishnas or Body Snatchers, I asked her for more details.

She said they all stood up together, put their hands on their chests and started to mumble this chant that started with "I spread the peaches."

Hands on their chests? I said, could it be that they are saying "I pledge allegiance?"

She said she had no idea. What did "pledge" mean and what did "allegiance" mean?

She was 16, and her English was pretty good, but in normal conversation, the words "pledge" and allegiance" are not frequently used with your 16 year old daughter, and so she didn't know either word in English, having grown up as a German.

The Dallas kids were so bored with chanting it each day that they mumbled it to the point where my daughter couldn't make out a word they were saying, and her ears transformed the first part into the closest thing she would have understood.

I spread the peaches to the flag....................
-------

**the OP tells how a Mississippi judge jailed a guy for not spreading the peaches. wtf?

Oh goody, more blasphemous art


A museum in Colorado is showing an exhibit of really crappy art, and if you look real close you'll see Jesus getting a blow job, supposedly. I can't quite make it out, but some loser with a computer, aka the Catholic League, has complained that Jesus is defiled.  LOL, defile me baby, oh , yeah, defile me.    

pic of the whole thing is here, the last panel is the smutty culprit. 


 About 50 people with no lives turned out to protest.

“It disgraces the God of all creation.” sez Linda King.

“We don’t think our savior should be put in those kind of poses,”sez Steven Gregory “I love art, but this isn’t art.”

I agree that's a terrible pose for a blow job, it looks like he's sticking it in the guys ear. That'll never work.
It is art though, just like what your first grader makes in art class, which by the look of it is where this came from. You just say nice things about it, don't try to figure out what they were trying to describe. Whoops, too late, Susan already went there:

Susan Ison, the city's director of cultural services, said ... Chagoya was attempting to describe his "midlife crisis" in the piece. 
"It's very complex," said Ison. "I really can't describe simply what he's trying to get at."

Mmmm, grant money?

The right wing is all angry and shooting at their feet, too. A particularly nasty commenter at that first link rants that

3. You’ll never see any of these “artists” do anything remotely similar to Muhammad.

and some idiot with a blog even made a post called well-thank-god-it-isnt-muhammad.  Ummm, guys, that kneeling beardo with his head on fire? with the piggy hookers? That's muhammad, dumbasses.   I know, this information is hidden away in books, but at least pay attention when the Teevee gives you your hating orders. 


“It is visual profanity,” said art gallery owner Linda King, in an interview with the Loveland Reporter-Herald. “It disgraces the God of all creation.”

She's wrong. It's not visual profanity.  This is visual profanity.


10/6/10

Is this a Joke?


If you know anyone who would buy this product, my advice is to stay far, far away from them.



10/5/10

The Zombie Hordes (mat 27:52-3)


Zombies in the Bible? Yeah, I don't know why this doesn't get more play. I've heard christains go all orgasmic over 'Jesus was the only person who ever rose from the dead bla bla bla', and by 'known' they mean their book says so, well, NOT!

The tombs broke open and the bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life.  They came out of the tombs, and after Jesus' resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many people. (Matthew 27:52-3)
I'd say something here, but this guy already said it.
“why is nothing of the sort mentioned in Roman history? I guess this would be something every frigging legionary, centurion, scribe, rabbi, scholar, visiting Martian and space-time hopping member of the Great Race of Yith would take note of, I presume.  A zombie-plague in Jerusalem!”



PS. Matthew's the only one who says this. Mark, Luke, and John were all too embarrassed to include it in their gospels. Lulz.